You may have heard by now that the Senate approved a deal to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security. But here is the part you shouldn’t miss: Democrats didn’t cave.
Let’s start there, because how you think about this deal matters.
Whenever there is a government shutdown, the first fight is over who is to blame. This time, Republicans repeatedly argued that the shutdown was being caused by Democrats, hoping the long lines at airports would pressure them to fold.
But Democrats made clear that their only demand in this spending fight was to put limits on the out-of-control enforcement operations from Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
For weeks, Democrats put bills on the floor to fund the rest of the Homeland Security department, including the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Coast Guard, among other important agencies. Everything except ICE and Customs and Border Protection.
Republicans voted against these bills. Over and over again.
So when TSA agents were working without pay, when Coast Guard families were taking out payday loans and when travelers were stuck in long lines at the airport, that was not because Democrats refused to fund the government; it was because Republicans refused to negotiate.
That was the GOP’s entire strategy. Create pressure. Assign blame. Wait for Democrats to fold. It has worked in the past.
This time, it didn’t.
I asked Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin about this on “The Weeknight” on Tuesday, and I said plainly what a lot of people have been saying for years: Democrats are known for caving. For taking the off-ramp when the pressure builds.
This week, there was one: a proposal that would have let everyone declare progress and move on, but without the accountability and reforms that Democrats have been demanding for ICE. It would have looked like a win.
It was not a win, and Democrats did not take it. Baldwin told me why.
She represents Wisconsin, right next door to Minnesota, where the federal government surged 3,000 ICE agents. During that deployment, two U.S. citizens were killed, including Alex Pretti, who had grown up in Wisconsin. After that surge, Baldwin’s office received more calls from Wisconsinites than on any issue they had seen before.
That is not abstract. That is what accountability looks like when it is demanded by the people you represent. And she laid out what Democrats were asking for. Not slogans, but specifics.
No more roving patrols near churches and schools. Judicial warrants before agents enter homes or businesses. Officers identifying themselves, removing masks, wearing body cameras. A basic code of conduct with real accountability. Not a handshake agreement. Not “trust us.” Real reforms, written into law.
Republicans rejected those demands. Repeatedly.
They did not agree to the guardrails Democrats laid out. They did not concede on ICE or CBP reforms.
And because of that, Democrats did not vote to fund ICE or CBP.
That line held.
But here is where the shift happened.
After calling their proposal a “final offer,” Republicans came back to the table and moved on the broader funding. A version of what Democrats had already been trying to pass earlier in the week. Funding the rest of the department. Keeping TSA, FEMA and the Coast Guard running, without forcing Democrats to surrender on ICE.
That matters.
The outcome here is not that Democrats got everything they wanted. They didn’t.
Because the outcome here is not that Democrats got everything they wanted. They didn’t.
It is that they did not give up what they were fighting for in order to get a deal. They separated the fights: fund the government, continue the fight over ICE.
That is discipline. That is leverage.
For a long time in Washington, the pattern has been the opposite. Bundle everything together, force a concession and call it compromise.
This time, Democrats refused that framework. They did not fund ICE without reforms. They did not accept a take-it-or-leave-it demand. And they did not cave under pressure.
Now the bill moves to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson will have to decide whether Republicans follow through or reopen the same fight.
But the lesson for Democrats from this week is already clear: Holding the line is not the victory; it is the test. And this time, Democrats passed it.
And in Washington, that is how power actually starts to shift.
Don’t forget to subscribe to “MS NOW Presents: Clock It,” Symone Sanders Townsend’s new podcast series with Eugene Daniels on the latest political news, the catchiest cultural moments and how they converge. Listen to the latest episode here.
The post Democrats won the fight over long lines at the airport. Here’s why. appeared first on MS NOW.
Author: Source Author
From MS Now.