Category: Uncategorized

  • The Declaration of Independence says ‘all men are created equal.’ These founders acted like they believed it.

    This piece is part of America in the balance: the fight for our history and future,” a special series from MS NOW that explores where we are as a nation as we commemorate the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

    Hagiography about the founding fathers is being imposed on us. But I refuse to let others choose my heroes and historical narratives for me. As a Civil Rights baby who sat on my mother’s lap as she was arrested for demanding to be served at a segregated lunch counter, I reserve my praise for radicals who challenged the pro-slavery culture that pervaded America from the 1600s at least through the Civil War.

    That George Washington was a brave national hero to whom all Americans owe an enormous debt of gratitude is undeniable. It’s also undeniable that Washington was unwilling to extricate himself from slavery or publicly oppose the practice during his lifetime. President Donald Trump has attempted to hide that part of Washington’s story. In January, the National Park Service removed from the President’s House in Philadelphia 34 educational panels that told the story of nine people whom the first president and his wife, Martha, enslaved there. One of those nine, Ona Judge (or Oney), escaped, and Washington spent the final three years of his life trying and failing to capture and re-enslave her. Despite a federal court order that the 34 panels be reinstalled, the Trump administration has not fully complied.

    I reserve my praise for radicals who challenged the pro-slavery culture that pervaded America.

    Unlike Washington or Thomas Jefferson, the founders I claim meet a high standard: They believed in freedom for all and were willing to construct a multiracial democracy to guarantee it. My founders aren’t defined by the office they held, their wealth, military achievement or celebrity. What unites them is that they rejected the despotism inherent in slavery. The ones who were white were willing to give up the benefits of supremacy. And they resisted, in public, with their words and actions, often at great personal risk. It is important at this moment that we remember them — if only to rebuke the idea that opposing slavery was not an option at our nation’s founding.

    If I were to ask you to name the most vocal opponent to slavery at 1787’s Constitutional Convention, you’d probably say, “Ben Franklin?” 

    You’d be wrong. Yes, Franklin eventually stopped buying human beings and expressed strong misgivings about the harshness of slavery (and the idleness in white people he said it caused). At the end of his life, he led the Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Society and petitioned Congress for the gradual abolition of slavery. But the fiercest opponent to slavery at the convention was Gouverneur Morris, the New York aristocrat who wrote the “We the People” preamble to the Constitution and the document’s final draft.

    Morris, who paid wages to everyone who worked for him at his 1,900-acre estate, challenged the future Empire State to gradually abolish slavery. At the Constitutional Convention.  Morris said he “never would concur in upholding domestic slavery,” that it was a “nefarious institution” and “the curse of heaven on the states where it prevailed.” He castigated delegates from Georgia and South Carolina who demanded three-fifths representation for enslaved people. “Are they men?” he asked. “Then make them citizens, and let them vote.”

    A tiny band of other founding radicals also raised their voices. Dr. Benjamin Rush, three years before he signed the Declaration of Independence, published a full-throated pamphlet opposing slavery as contrary to Christianity and natural rights and professed his belief in the equality of “Whites and Negroes.” He was a leader in the Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Society, though his abolitionist reputation is stained by the fact that he secretly enslaved his cook, William Grubber, and refused to free him until he was fully compensated. The Marquis de Lafayette entreated George Washington to teach the world how to gradually abolish slavery by converting his slaves to tenant farmers. Lafayette, who never enslaved people, would follow through alone on the experiment in the French colony of Cayenne. 

    Elizabeth Freeman, a Black woman, should be considered a founding mother because she brought the first case to challenge the constitutionality of slavery in Massachusetts and won — a victory not only for herself. Her case helped bring about judicial abolition for all enslaved people in her state by 1783 – four years before the Constitutional Convention. Actual reconstruction of America as the land of the free, for all, began because an illiterate enslaved woman demanded what she was entitled to.

    I valorize Frederick Douglass, whose 1852 oration “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” called out the hypocrisy of a slaveholding country declaring that “all men are created equal.”

    Phillis Wheatley, the first Black American to publish a book of poetry, resisted her own enslavement and advocated for abolition by writing herself into the political narrative. She became a celebrity — arguably the most famous African in America and Europe in her time, so much so that Franklin and Washington both invited her to meet with them. 

    Benjamin Lay, a white man who had personally experienced discrimination as a hunchbacked dwarf, wrote one of the first books in human history to call for the immediate, uncompensated abolition of slavery — in 1738. (Franklin anonymously printed that polemic). Lay, a Quaker, refused to use any product made with slave labor, and he berated Quaker enslavers, inspiring later generations of Quaker radicals to take the lead in advocating for abolition.

    There are numerous other unsung revolutionary abolitionists who contributed to America’s freedom story, as did the “second founders,” as one historian has called them. Among them, I valorize the self-emancipated Frederick Douglass, whose 1852 oration “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” called out the hypocrisy of a slaveholding country declaring that “all men are created equal.” And Congress’ Radical Republicans, such as Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens, who championed the 13th and 14th Amendments that finally extended our nation’s founding ideals to Black Americans — and other nonwhite, non-Anglo-Saxon, non-Protestant or non-wealthy people. 

    Another second founder is John Mercer Langston, the first dean of Howard Law School, who co-authored the Civil Rights Bill of 1875 with Sumner. Had a hostile Supreme Court not struck the bill down with reasoning that defied the original intent of the second founders, white people would have been forced to begin practicing pluralism in integrated trains, restaurants, hotels and other public accommodations a century earlier.

    Had that Supreme Court not given license to Jim Crow in 1896 in Plessy v. Ferguson, my mother would not have had to part with 4-month-old me in 1962 and spend time in jail for protesting Alabama’s apartheid. Perhaps my father wouldn’t have needed to found an independent political party that helped return Black Alabamians to public office for the first time since Reconstruction.

    I came of age watching West Alabama sharecroppers insist that popular sovereignty include them. They taught me that perfecting democracy requires citizens agitating for the freedoms and the government they deserve.

    Uncritically celebrating the traditional founding fathers and ignoring their tolerance of slavery renders the revolutionary founders who opposed slavery invisible.

    Uncritically celebrating the traditional founding fathers and ignoring their tolerance of slavery renders the revolutionary founders who opposed slavery invisible and dishonors the generations who were still fighting for their freedom almost two centuries later.

    Freedom to explore and understand historic truth is necessary to make course corrections and work toward our highest ideals. An America that encourages such exploration in celebrating its 250th birthday would be exceptional and a beacon to the world. But a government that blindly idolizes the past and discourages honest reckoning with history betrays our founding value of liberty for all.

    I take heart in the motley allies who fought during Reconstruction to build the first interracial democracy in human history and fought to resurrect it with the Civil Rights revolution. And each generation has to fight to keep it.

    The post The Declaration of Independence says ‘all men are created equal.’ These founders acted like they believed it. appeared first on MS NOW.

    From MS Now.

  • Trump discloses 327 unreported stock trades made a day before his first tariff pause

    Investment accounts owned by President Donald Trump made more than 300 undisclosed stock trades the day before he paused many of the “Liberation Day” tariffs.

    This post was originally published on NBC News.

  • Everything We Know About Taylor Swift’s Wedding

    Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are staying tight-lipped about their wedding … but we’re piecing the puzzle together for you. With rumors running rampant, it can be tricky to keep up with what’s real and what’s not, so we’ve rounded up everything…

    From TMZ.

  • Donna Kelce Arrives in NYC Ahead of Taylor Swift and Son Travis’ Wedding

    Madison Square Garden’s biggest delivery isn’t coming in on a truck … it’s Mama Kelce, who just rolled up after flying into town. Donna Kelce has officially arrived in New York ahead of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s massive wedding celebration.…

    From TMZ.

  • WATCH: Celebrations across the country for USMNT’s victory

    Americans at watch parties across the U.S. celebrated the U.S. men’s national team’s victory over Bosnia-Herzegovina as they advance to round of 16 in the World Cup.

    Source: ABC News

  • Hillary Clinton slams ‘embarrassing’ Supreme Court ruling expanding Trump’s firing power

    Hillary Clinton warned that the Supreme Court’s Republican majority is “turning the clock back” with some of its recent decisions, including the “nonsensical” ruling earlier this week that gives the president the authority to fire members of independent federal agencies.

    The former secretary of state pointed to the “mental gymnastics” that the high court performed when it backed President Donald Trump in his case against Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, whom he fired without cause. The ruling on Monday overturned a 1935 precedent that had protected agency independence. 

    “I mean, it is a nonsensical — and it’s almost embarrassing to read, because they know it’s nonsensical, but they don’t care,” Clinton said during an interview published Thursday with Marc Elias, the founder of the progressive platform Democracy Docket.

    She suggested that the court’s separate ruling that day allowing fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to keep her job for now made the Slaughter decision even less coherent.

    “What we’ve got is a full court attack on fundamental principles of constitutional law, judicial precedent, of long-standing norms and interpretation, and it truly is turning the clock back,” Clinton added.

    Her cutting declaration followed Tuesday’s final day of Supreme Court decisions for cases argued this term.

    Clinton called on Democrats to “play the long game” like conservatives have when it comes to the high court. She pointed to the power harnessed by the Federalist Society, a national coalition of conservative lawyers and law students that seeks to install right-leaning legal minds in presidential administrations and across the judiciary. Six of the nine current Supreme Court justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, who authored the landmark 2024 presidential immunity decision in Trump v. United States, are current or former members of the society.

    According to Clinton, Democrats might just learn something from it.

    “My fear, and I’ve said this to a lot of people, is, you know, we don’t, as I mentioned earlier, play the long game, and we don’t play it in a coherent, unified way,” Clinton said. “Let’s get together. There are certain fundamental decisions that have to be made. Democracy is core to that.”

    The post Hillary Clinton slams ‘embarrassing’ Supreme Court ruling expanding Trump’s firing power appeared first on MS NOW.

    From MS Now.

  • Why Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Donated $26 Million to Charity Ahead of Their Wedding

    Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce kicked off their celebrations with an impressively generous wedding gift for those in need.

    Source: Vogue

  • U.S. Olympic canoeist David ‘Davey’ Hearn charged in Reflecting Pool vandalism

    U.S. Olympic canoeist David “Davey” Hearn was indicted Thursday on a single count of destruction of property after he was accused of causing more than $1,000 worth of damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

    This post was originally published on NBC News.

  • Ashley Tisdale ‘Toxic’ Mom Drama Comedy in the Works

    If at any point you thought to yourself the Ashley Tisdale “toxic” mom group saga would be perfect for a scripted show … you just got beat to the punch. The “High School Musical” star is looking to capitalize on this year’s online drama –…

    From TMZ.

  • Malcolm D. Lee, Chloe Bailey, And Lucien Laviscount Pull Back The Curtain On Peacock’s ‘Strung’

    One thing audiences have learned about Malcolm D. Lee over the past three decades is to expect the unexpected. While his name has become synonymous with films like The Best Man, Girls Trip, and Night School, his latest project marks the first time he’s stepped behind the camera for a psychological thriller. With Strung, the veteran filmmaker embraces suspense while assembling a cast led by Chloe Bailey, Lynn Whitfield, Lucien Laviscount, Anna Diop, and Coco Jones for a story filled with mystery and deception.

    Premiering as the opening night selection of the 30th American Black Film Festival before arriving on Peacock, Strung follows Layla, a gifted violinist trying to rebuild her life after suffering a devastating personal loss. Unable to secure a coveted position with the Philharmonic, she spends her days teaching music to children while staying with her best friend Jasmine, played by Jones. Everything changes after Layla meets Audra, an affluent woman portrayed by Whitfield, who offers her a live-in position tutoring her gifted granddaughter, Zuri.

    Lee immediately knew the screenplay offered something unlike anything he had directed before. “The truth of the matter is I don’t consider myself a one trick pony,” he told ESSENCE. “I love doing comedy, but I’ve always wanted to do different genres. I’ve always wanted to find the right project that would speak to me. And, when the script came across my desk, I was like, ‘Oh, this is really a great page-turner. It’s lean forwardable.’ I was talking back to the script as I was reading it.”

    Although Strung marks new territory for Lee, audiences familiar with his previous films will still recognize one defining characteristic. Relationships remain at the heart of the story. Every revelation depends on trust, betrayal, and the complicated dynamics inside one family. Suspense simply becomes the vehicle carrying those themes. Music also plays a major role throughout the film. Rather than using orchestral pieces simply as background, Lee wanted the violin to become part of Layla’s identity while adding another layer of tension.

    “[Layla] was already a violinist,” Lee explained. “I thought briefly about making her a cellist, but I was like, ‘That’s not sexy.’” He believes the instrument naturally lends itself to suspense. “It is haunting, it is beautiful, it’s melodic, and it stretches genres as well. Music is such an important element to this movie overall. I love strings in general because they can bring such emotion to a project—I think it was the perfect instrument to center this movie around.”

    Finding someone capable of carrying nearly every scene became equally important. Lee says Bailey possessed the emotional range required for the lead’s complicated journey. “We wanted to find somebody who was young and vibrant and beautiful and sexy and also play a range of emotions,” he said. Bailey welcomed the opportunity, though one of her biggest takeaways had little to do with suspense. Working opposite Whitfield became an acting masterclass.

    “I am a present person, but Ms. Lynn taught me to be even more present,” Bailey said. “What I admired about her is that, yes, she knows who she is and how people love her, but when it comes to her craft, she does not play with that.” Watching Whitfield remain fully committed during every take left a lasting impression. “Even when the camera coverage was not on her, she still gave 110% for the scene so that the other person could act and give the best reactions in that way,” Bailey added. “As accomplished as she is, she really didn’t need to do that.”

    Laviscount, who plays the film’s enigmatic counterpart to Layla, additionally appreciated the director’’s approach behind the camera, particularly seeing Lee apply storytelling instincts developed through years of making ensemble films. “Malcolm’s a master of creating conflict and great characters and it puts them together and it becomes what we’ve grown to love,” he said. “But throwing that danger element on top of it just kind of stretches things in a whole different direction.”

    “I learned a lot on this project,” Laviscount added. “Malcolm knows exactly what he wants, how he wants it. I think that you kind of bring what you can to set and yeah, it’s a beautiful compromise.”

    Produced by Tyler Perry, Jason Blum, Tim Palen, Lee, and Dominique Telson, Strung represents a new creative chapter for a filmmaker who has spent years expanding his résumé. With suspense replacing comedy and mystery driving the story from beginning to end, Lee proves there are still new directions left to explore.

    Strung is streaming now on Peacock.

  • Colorado governor fires clemency board members, adding to Tina Peters fiasco

    Jared Polis has done quite a bit over his 25-year career in public service. The Colorado Democrat served six years on the state board of education, 10 years as a member of Congress and this year, he’s wrapping up his second full term as governor — an office he won twice by wide margins.

    But it appears increasingly likely that Polis will be known, at least to national audiences, for a single misguided decision.

    A couple of months ago, the governor waited until late on a Friday afternoon (a time popular with politicians who want their decisions to go largely unnoticed) to announce his commutation for Tina Peters, a convicted felon who illegally tried to use her office in pursuit of pro-Trump election conspiracy theories.

    Confronted with bipartisan criticisms of the decision, Polis appeared on CNN and presented a defense that made very little sense and misstated basic factual details, reinforcing concerns that the governor had simply succumbed to Donald Trump’s indefensibly aggressive coercion efforts, even if the Coloradan was reluctant to admit it.

    In mid-June, The New York Times reported that Polis’ own clemency board twice voted unanimously to reject Peters’ bid for early release, citing disclosures from two board members. The first vote came in January, and it was soon followed by “an unusual request” from the governor’s office, asking the panel to take a second look because of the “enormous political pressure” Polis was facing from the White House.

    Members agreed to review the case anew but still came to the unanimous conclusion that Peters, based on all the available information, simply did not deserve to be released.

    The governor ignored his own clemency board in May, and this week, he fired the members who disclosed what had unfolded behind the scenes. The Times also reported:

    Gov. Jared Polis of Colorado on Wednesday fired two members of his clemency board after they spoke out against his decision to commute the prison sentence of the election denier Tina Peters.

    The board members, Hannah Seigel Proff and Azra Taslimi, had objected to Mr. Polis’s decision in May to release Ms. Peters from prison after pressure from President Trump.

    “You breached the required duty of confidentiality by publicly divulging board members’ votes,” Polis wrote in the letters shared with the newspaper.

    For her part, Taslimi, a former public defender, told the Times, “He’s saying the public doesn’t have the right to know his own advisory board told him no — twice. He’s not protecting a process. He’s protecting himself from scrutiny.”

    The president, meanwhile, welcomed Peters, one of his favorite convicted felons, to the Oval Office this week. Around the same time, Trump published a lengthy item to his social media platform on Tuesday afternoon, writing of the Colorado election denier, “She was put [in prison] because she found Election Fraud, but instead of arresting the people that committed the Fraud, they arrested her! … Just think of it, she caught the Democrats cheating, and they put her in jail for Voter Fraud.”

    That’s the opposite of what happened in reality.

    Trump nevertheless added that Peters “came to the White House to thank me for getting her released from prison in Colorado.” In other words, as far as the president is concerned, it was his efforts to bully the state into submission, not the governor’s magnanimity, that led to Peters’ release.

    In May, Polis said he’s confident that his commutation decision, in time, will be “remembered fondly.” Governor, if you see this, I wouldn’t count on it.

    The post Colorado governor fires clemency board members, adding to Tina Peters fiasco appeared first on MS NOW.

    From MS Now.

  • Hillary Clinton knocks Pulte: ‘You should definitely be worried about everything’

    From The Hill

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton went after acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Bill Pulte, saying that she wished there were career and political appointees across agencies, that were “slow-walking or refusing to share information with” him. “You should definitely be worried about everything. This is a naked partisan takeover of the Director of…