The decision, seen as a win for central bank independence, sends the fight over removal back to the lower courts.
Category: Uncategorized
-
Haberman: Vance’s opposition to Iran war cost him with Trump
New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman on Sunday said Vice President Vance’s opposition to the war was unique among President Trump’s advisers, and ultimately hurt his relationship with the commander-in-chief. “Vance was the only one who really vocally took issue with this with Trump. And it irritated Trump, it cost Vance with Trump,…
-
19 Truly Wild And Interesting Facts About ’90s Movies That Honestly Sound Completely Made Up, But Are Somehow 100% True
Whether you love movie trivia or ’90s nostalgia, these fascinating facts are worth the read.

-
Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff headed to Qatar for Iran talks
Special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner are on their way to Qatar for Iran peace talks. “I just spoke with the president about it. Iran has requested a meeting this week, so, special envoy Witkoff and Jared Kushner will be flying to Doha for high level meetings this week as we…
-
The Blanche test is a red alert moment for the rule of law
Todd Blanche is everything an attorney general should not be.
-
NFL record holder Johnson reveals ALS diagnosis
NFL record holder Chris Johnson reveals that he has been diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
-
Supreme Court halts Trump’s firing of Fed’s Lisa Cook
The Supreme Court blocked President Trump’s firing of Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook on Monday in a 5-4 vote, ruling she can remain on the job as her legal challenge moves forward. Trump became the first president to attempt to fire a Fed board member in its 112-year history when he sacked Cook last year over accusations of mortgage…
-
Millie Bobby Brown Just Reflected On The Basic “Life Skills” She Has Missed Out On After Spending Her Childhood On “Stranger Things,” And It’s Genuinely Kind Of Sad
Millie also poked fun at the cruel trolling she receives for how old she looks as she reflected on how being a child star has impacted her basic life skills.

-
New data shows consumers dropped health coverage after Republicans let subsidies expire
Democrats spent much of 2025 reminding Republicans about a looming deadline: Without congressional action, tens of millions of American consumers would lose their existing subsidies under the Affordable Care Act and face dramatic spikes in their healthcare coverage. This, Democrats warned, would in turn force many families simply to give up and go without insurance.
As last year came to an end, congressional Republicans nevertheless chose not to act. The ACA insurance subsidies that Democrats created during Joe Biden’s presidency were allowed to expire at midnight on Dec. 31.
For those involved in the healthcare debate, the question was less about whether Americans would choose to forgo coverage and more about how many. With this in mind, NPR reported:
Far more people than previously known have dropped Affordable Care Act health insurance for 2026, according to data released Friday.
Five million fewer people are currently enrolled in ACA marketplace plans compared to the record high reached last year. More than 1 million fewer people picked a plan for 2026, and then 4 million more either disenrolled or failed to pay their premiums and therefore dropped coverage.
I’m mindful that different news organizations have published reports looking at the same data but have pointed in slightly different directions. The Associated Press, for example, reported that roughly 3 million fewer people “had Affordable Care Act health insurance plans in February compared with the same time last year.” The Hill, meanwhile, reported that about 4 million Americans “have dropped out of Affordable Care Act insurance coverage this year.”
These reports are all accurate, though they’re counting in slightly different ways. The NPR report’s tally, however, captures the context in a straightforward way: Federal data shows enrollment in the ACA marketplace reached 24.2 million people in 2025, and now that total is 19.2 million people.
Republican officials don’t deny the accuracy of the data, although they have repeatedly tried to argue that the reduction is a positive development. The Trump administration has had great success in cracking down on fraud and ineligible enrollees, the argument goes, which is why the overall enrollment total has fallen.
There’s reason to be skeptical of the GOP’s official line.
Cynthia Cox, a vice president and director of the ACA program at the healthcare research nonprofit KFF, told the AP, “We know that real people lost their health insurance coverage. This coverage loss happened at the same time millions of people faced double or even triple digit increases in their premium payments.”
In other words, people dropped their coverage when Republicans allowed prices to soar to levels consumers could no longer afford.
Stacey Pogue, senior research fellow at the Georgetown Center on Health Insurance Reforms, similarly told NPR, “I don’t see data that point to that conclusion that a 5 million person drop can be explained by allegations of fraud. There’s lots of evidence pointing to people making decisions based on what they can pay each month.”
It didn’t have to be this way. This was a deliberate policy choice made by Republican officials who had an opportunity to leave a better alternative in place.
This post updates our related earlier coverage.
The post New data shows consumers dropped health coverage after Republicans let subsidies expire appeared first on MS NOW.
-
Supreme Court strengthens Trump’s firing power at independent agencies
The Supreme Court strengthened President Trump’s control over independent agencies in a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, overruling 91 years of precedent that allowed Congress to insulate certain executive branch officials with firing protections. In an expansion of presidential power, the ruling gives Trump the right to sack Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic appointee who…
-
Justices rule Trump cannot fire Fed member, but grants more power over independent agencies
The Supreme Court delivered a setback to President Donald Trump, rejecting his attempt to fire Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, while in a separate case giving him a freer hand to exert control over other hitherto independent federal agencies.
