Category: Uncategorized

  • Numan Acar Joins Universal’s ‘The Mummy’ As Kevin J. O’Connor And Oded Fehr Ink Deals To Return

    EXCLUSIVE: Numan Acar (Young Sherlock) has inked a deal to join The Mummy, the next installment in the action-adventure franchise from Universal Pictures. Also newly locked are a pair of franchise veterans, Kevin J. O’Connor and Oded Fehr. Both O’Connor and Fehr were introduced in 1999’s The Mummy, with Fehr reprising in 2001’s The Mummy Returns. O’Connor played Beni […]

    Source: Deadline.

  • Clavicular Won’t Face Charges For Allegedly Encouraging Women To Fight

    Clavicular is no longer facing criminal prosecution in connection with a fight at a short-term rental in Florida … because prosecutors dropped the charges. As we previously reported, the popular and controversial influencer and streamer found…

    From TMZ.

  • Grisham files restraining order against Max Miller

    From The Hill

    Former White House Communications Director during President Trump’s first term Stephanie Grisham filed a restraining order against Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio), following allegations of abuse from his ex-wife. Grisham’s counsel Mark S. Zaid announced on social platform X that they filed for a temporary restraining order against Miller as an ongoing lawsuit continues. The case…

  • Talarico: Republican attacks on trans people ‘culture war fights designed to tear us apart’

    From The Hill

    Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico said Monday that Republican attacks on transgender people are “culture war fights designed to tear us apart.” “I mean, I don’t think we win by selling people out. And we’re refusing to do that in this campaign.  This is a campaign of, by and for all Texans. And I…

  • Appeals court blocks Trump from rescinding green bank funds

    From The Hill

    In a reversal, a federal appeals court has once again blocked the Trump administration from rescinding billions in climate funds issued under the Biden administration’s signature Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated part of a previous preliminary injunction that temporarily bars the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from clawing back billions in “green…

  • GB Snowsport loses UK Sport funding but athletes unaffected

    UK Sport will no longer channel investment in skiing and snowboarding through the sports’ UK governing body, GB Snowsport.

    Source: BBC.

  • ‘Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story’ Sets Netflix Release Date, Unveils First-Look Photos

    We’re getting the first look and a release date for Ryan Murphy and Ian Brennan’s Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story. The highly anticipated latest chapter in the Monster anthology will premiere September 17 on Netflix. Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story tells the story of how one young woman changed what the world believed a killer […]

    Source: Deadline.

  • Stassi Schroeder Says Taylor Frankie Paul is Self-Sabotaging

    Stassi Schroeder says she thought Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” would eventually come out … but now she’s not sure … because she says TFP can’t get out of her own way. The former “Vanderpump Rules” star — who is now…

    From TMZ.

  • Sean Duffy’s ‘Great American Road Trip’ Series Delayed by Post-Production Tweaks

    Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy’s patriotic road trip series is still coming … and TMZ has learned minor post-production tweaks are behind the delay. Sources familiar with the project tell TMZ … editors have been making final adjustments to…

    From TMZ.

  • California and other blue states warn of ‘extreme’ risk in backing Trump election order

    California and other Democratic-led states told the Supreme Court that granting the federal government’s pending request for emergency relief on President Donald Trump’s mail-in ballot executive order would have “extreme” consequences just ahead of the fall’s midterm elections.

    They said that backing the administration would let the government “rush out an unprecedented, legally indefensible voter-verification and ballot-interception program that would, among other things, give the U.S. Postal Service far-reaching new powers and responsibilities.”

    The states said that under Trump’s order, the Postal Service would require states to assemble lists of voters registered to cast mail ballots and then upload those lists to what the states called an “untested” online portal. The states also said that they would have to redesign their ballot mail to align with new Postal Service requirements and that the service would refuse to deliver ballots for voters not identified in the database.

    “The consequences of allowing such transformative changes to take effect so close to this fall’s elections would be extreme,” California and 22 other states and the District of Columbia told the justices in their opposition to the administration’s urgent request to implement the order.  

    “Because of the high risk of errors and the limited window for correcting mistakes, many of the millions of voters who rely on mail voting — especially voters with disabilities and those in rural areas — would likely be denied mail ballots and, as a result, disenfranchised,” they told the justices.

    “Many more voters would be confused,” they added, “either because they wouldn’t receive their mail ballots or would fear that USPS would fail to deliver their voted ballots to state officials for tabulation.”

    The issue before the justices in this round of litigation isn’t whether Trump’s order is lawful but rather whether lower courts wrongly found that the states could challenge it at this time. The Justice Department argues that the challenge is premature and procedurally improper.

    “The Executive Order does not direct definitive substantive outcomes,” the DOJ told the justices, stressing that the order says government agencies must implement it in accordance with the law, and that it’s uncertain at this point exactly how they would implement it, making the challenge premature.

    But the states said there’s “no sensible reason” to have them wait to challenge the order until just weeks before the November elections. They said that what matters for the purposes of this litigation is that the order is making state and local election officials change their behavior. They cited a case the justices decided earlier this year in a dispute over the rules for bringing lawsuits, in which the court observed that the “value of a sword of Damocles is that it hangs — not that it drops.”

    The DOJ turned to the high court after a three-judge federal appellate panel declined to lift an Obama-appointed Massachusetts judge’s injunction against the administration. The panel noted that the government wasn’t defending the legality of Trump’s order but rather only argued that the states didn’t procedurally have legal standing to challenge it.

    But the panel found that concessions made by the government in the litigation cut against its prematurity argument, including the concession that it wants to enforce the order nationwide for the midterm elections and would do so were it not for the judge’s injunction.

    A Trump-appointed appellate judge, Joshua Dunlap, partially dissented from the panel ruling that had two Biden appointees in the majority. Though he agreed with the majority when it came to the Postal Service, he disagreed on part of the order that directs the Homeland Security secretary to compile and transmit lists of citizen voters to state officials. “Provision of a State Citizenship List for informative purposes, allowing (but not requiring) States to use the list as a resource to check their own voter registration rolls, would cause Plaintiff States no injury,” Dunlap said.

    In its high court filing on Monday, the states argued that even Dunlap’s narrower position is wrong because the federal government has refused to say that it would not seek prosecutions if state officials send ballots to anyone not on the DHS citizenship lists. “If it is really true that States are not required to do anything with the lists, then it is difficult to understand why the federal government is fighting so hard to obtain a stay — or for that matter, how there could be any emergency warranting an immediate stay,” the states told the justices.

    Alabama and other red states are supporting the Trump administration in this litigation.

    The justices are off the bench for the summer, but they field emergency applications like these year-round. They could act on this one anytime in the coming days.

    In the final batch of rulings they issued in June before they rose for the summer, the justices split 5-4 against the GOP’s Trump-backed appeal that sought to bar states from counting mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but arrive later.

    The post California and other blue states warn of ‘extreme’ risk in backing Trump election order appeared first on MS NOW.

    From MS Now.

  • Francesca Hong defends call to ‘cancel Thanksgiving,’ but says ‘views can evolve’

    From The Hill

    Democratic socialist and former Wisconsin state Rep. Francesca Hong (D) on Monday defended a past social media post urging the country to “cancel Thanksgiving” further leaning into her progressive agenda that’s gained traction for her Wisconsin gubernatorial campaign.  Hong, a professional chef, said Thanksgiving is a “time that’s incredibly painful for many people in our…

  • Europe heat wave fuels drought, fires and energy fears

    A man walks on a sandbank by the wreckage of a WWII German warship, which emerged during the drought in front of Djerdap II, a large dam on the Danube River between Romania and Serbia near Prahovo on Aug. 4, 2026.

    Europe’s heat wave exposes buried history and new threats — Nazi-era wrecks emerge from the Danube, nuclear reactors face cooling risks, and Greece battles deadly wildfires.

    (Image credit: Darko Vojinovic)

    Source: NPR.