Category: Uncategorized

El lateral derecho de Bélgica aseguró que los temas extra cancha que han rodeado este partido han pasado desapercibidos para los jugadores, ya que ellos están concentrados en dar lo mejor en el campo y conseguir el resultado.

In case you missed it, Taylor Swift, America’s biggest pop star, tied the knot with football player Travis Kelce over the holiday weekend. In today’s special episode of “The Run-Through,” three Vogue staffers discuss the wedding of the year.

A man has been sentenced to life in prison for murdering his pregnant cousin and another woman in a Virginia residence … TMZ has learned. According to multiple reports, Edward Jackson Bland will serve two life terms without the possibility of…

Iranian officials say millions flooded the streets of Tehran for the funeral procession for Iran’s late supreme leader, assassinated by the U.S. and Israel at the start of the war earlier this year. For over three decades he ran a strict, authoritarian government, stoked regional conflict and oversaw a brutal crackdown on women. But today, Richard Engel was there for the national show of mourning and solidarity.

The BBC’s Daniel Bush looks at the US president’s comments over his request for Fifa to review Folarin Balogun’s one-match ban.

Two-time NBA Most Valuable Player Giannis Antetokounmpo joins Miami Heat from the Milwaukee Bucks.

After a tumultuous weekend for World Cup fans, US striker Folarin Balogun will play in the game against Belgium on Monday night. Maybe that doesn’t sound at all surprising, perhaps because you only learned the name Folarin Balogun today, when you heard that President Donald Trump was involved in all of this in some capacity. Maybe you heard there was an unprecedented appeal. Perhaps you know it’s controversial but you don’t know why. 

Good news: You’ve come to the right place.

On Sunday, FIFA made the decision to reverse Balogun’s one-game red card suspension, which will allow him to play against Belgium on Monday night — the US’s most important match of the 2026 World Cup. 

That decision raises a slew of questions. Why is this red card such a big deal? What does it mean for the US? Who exactly got the call reversed? And, given FIFA’s long and well-established history of doing bad things, is this just a little bit of corruption or, like, capital “C” corruption? 

Here’s what you need to know about the most controversial call of the World Cup so far.

What happened to US striker Folarin Balogun’s red card?

Balogun was given a red card during the US’s round of 32 match against Bosnia-Herzegovina on July 1. Balogun and Bosnian defender Tarik Muharemović were going after the same ball in the second half (at roughly the 61-minute mark), and Balogun stepped on Muharemović’s ankle and the back of his leg during the play. Initially, no transgression was called, but after a brief video review, the referee sent Balogun off in the 64th minute citing a serious foul or dangerous play. Players that get red cards are immediately taken out of the game and are given an automatic one-game suspension. 

At the time, fans, some sports journalists, and Fox’s on-air commentators criticized the call because it appeared to be “incidental contact”; they believed that the video assistant referee (VAR) slow-motion review made the play look more serious than it was. Though he writhed on the field, seemingly in pain, Muharemović finished the game, which could imply it was not a serious foul or dangerous play. 

The unprecedented part of this saga is that on Sunday, FIFA announced that Balogun’s red card was suspended, which means his suspension for the Belgium round of 16 match on Monday night would be reversed and he would be allowed to play. FIFA cited Article 27 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code (FDC) — a measure that allows the organization to suspend the execution of a disciplinary sanction. 

According to the FDC:

1.The judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure.

2. By suspending the implementation of the sanction, the judicial body subjects the person sanctioned to a probationary period of one to four years.

ESPN reported that Balogun’s automatic DQ would be suspended for a probationary period of one year. 

Why is this such a big deal?

A player getting a red card wiped and being allowed to play in their next match is fairly unheard of in soccer, especially on a stage as grand as the World Cup, so this would be a big deal no matter what team was involved. But it’s getting even more attention because of the optics: Balogun is the US’s most threatening goal-scorer, the US appears to be fielding its best men’s team in recent history, and the US is hosting the World Cup this year. 

So, some fans were already suspicious of what was really behind the reversal. Then, in the wake of FIFA’s decision, President Donald Trump thanked FIFA on Truth Social on Sunday, and went on to claim at least partial credit for getting Balogun’s suspension nixed.

“All I did was ask for a review. I didn’t say, ‘you have to do this,’” Trump said during a White House media briefing on Monday. “[A referee] made a call that nobody could believe…he’s our best player, or one of our best players. And he gave him a red card. I didn’t know what that meant. I didn’t think it meant much. Then I started hearing, you can’t play in the next game.” 

After Trump tried to take credit for the reversal — essentially saying he pulled strings to help the US — it put the spotlight on FIFA president Gianni Infantino and people began wondering whether or not he took a call from the sitting US president and then changed course. While Infantino asserted FIFA’s independence, he said in a statement on Monday that he did take Trump’s call, and also that he regularly fields calls from all kinds of important people who wield all kinds of influence:

Yes, I regularly discuss matters related to the FIFA World Cup with the President of the United States, and on this matter, I did receive a call from President Donald Trump, just as I receive calls from heads of state, government officials, football stakeholders and business executives from around the world on many different issues.

Essentially, after the questionable red card, the US (aka the 2026 World Cup home team) benefited from a slew of extremely rare, unprecedented decisions which will allow its team to play at full strength when it, under normal circumstances, would not be allowed to. These decisions came after its sitting president, one of the most powerful men in the world, bragged about calling the FIFA chief, who not just confirmed the call, but also confirmed that he is regularly on calls with other world leaders and very rich people who, one might assume, aren’t just interested in having innocuous gabs. 

FIFA is pretty famously corrupt; how big of a deal is this red card thing?

When talking about FIFA, it’s not really a question of whether soccer’s governing body is or isn’t corrupt, but rather the severity of said corruption.

In 2015, the US Department of Justice indicted nine FIFA officials for racketeering, conspiracy, and bribery. The DOJ at the time noted that “defendants also include U.S. and South American sports marketing executives who are alleged to have systematically paid and agreed to pay well over $150 million in bribes and kickbacks to obtain lucrative media and marketing rights to international soccer tournaments.”

In 2022, when Qatar hosted the World Cup, FIFA was criticized for widespread human rights and labor violations. Watchdog and advocacy organizations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International sounded the alarm that the government was taking advantage of and exploiting migrant workers under grueling conditions with little to no pay. FIFA, they say, reaped the benefits of this human cost. 

Through this lens, a decision about whether or not someone plays their next game is obviously way less serious than reports of slave labor. And given the 2015 indictment, and everything else we know about FIFA at this point, the existence of corruption and favoritism in FIFA’s system isn’t exactly groundbreaking. Balogun also might not even be the most controversial player still in the tournament — Morocco’s captain and star player Achraf Hakimi has been ordered to stand trial for rape charges. (Hakimi denies any wrongdoing.)

One could make the argument that no professional sport is immune from scandal, exploitation, and corruption: We’ve seen gold medal ice dancers with abuse allegations in the Olympics, NBA players allegedly betting on themselves, doping in tennis, and the way the NFL handles domestic abuse. Still, FIFA’s ability to stand out in this crowded field is remarkable, in the bleakest sense of the term.   

Now that Balogun’s red card has been essentially rescinded (at least for this game) and all eyes are on FIFA and the refs, a new can of corrupt worms appears to have been opened. On Monday, a member of the UK Parliament asked for the Balogun treatment be applied to UK player Jarell Quansah. Similarly, France has also asked for the same appeal with star player Michael Olise, who received a yellow card during its match with Paraguay on Saturday. 

FIFA has not ruled in either of those cases. Though, to be fair, Trump hasn’t said he’s put in any more calls either. 

Bryan Cranston was one of several actors who played presidents onscreen that wrote about the office for Vanity Fair’s celebration of America’s 250th.

American forward Folarin Balogun will start tonight for the USMNT against Belgium in the World Cup last-16 knockout match. Balogun was sent off in the previous round against Bosnia and Herzegovina and was due to serve a one-match suspension tonight — before world football governing body FIFA unusually lifted the ban following an effort from Trump administration officials.

Was there a more poignant photo of America at 250 years old than the one Reuters captured of a young Black woman on a Washington commuter train surrounded by white nationalists with covered faces?

There were photos of fireworks on July 4. Photos of the president preening at Mount Rushmore. Photos of the predictably over-the-top red, white and blue patriotic display in Philadelphia before the holiday’s World Cup match between France and Paraguay. But those spectacles provided a facade that only sees the country as “America the Beautiful,” when reality is far more complex. The journalist on the Washington Metro who photographed the young Black woman beset by members of the racist Patriot Front provided an uglier and more honest image of this American moment.

America’s 250th birthday should have been a celebration of democracy, but that’s not Patriot Front’s thing. According to its website, “Democracy has failed this once great nation.” It favors a “hard reset” and a “return to the traditions and virtues of our forefathers.” My forefathers (and foremothers, too, for that matter) had traditions and virtues worthy of praise and emulation, but nobody in Patriot Front should be expected to see the beauty in Black people’s essential contributions to this country.

Reuters reported that hundreds of members of Patriot Front took public transportation before and after marching in the nation’s capital carrying their own flag, several variations of the U.S. flag and, of course, the old racist standard, the Confederate battle flag.

The George Washington University Program on Extremism describes Patriot Front as a white nationalist organization founded after the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017. James Alex Fields Jr. , a self-described white supremacist,  murdered counterprotester Heather Heyer at that rally.

The GW center says Patriot Front “promotes an ultra-nationalist ideology centered on the idea of creating a white ethnostate in the United States, rejecting multiculturalism and diversity.”

Play

Masked white supremacist group marches through Washington during July 4th

July 6, 2026 / 07:47

When Norman Rockwell created a painting inspired by 6-year-old Ruby Bridges’ daily walk through a gauntlet of white supremacists to William Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans, he called it “The Problem We All Live With.” In the 1960s, when Bridges integrated what had been an all-white school and Rockwell drew inspiration from her ordeal, that problem was easy to name: White people terrified at the thought of a multiracial democracy were trying to threaten everybody fighting for it into submission.

Almost 70 years later, with a civil rights movement in between, an increasingly diverse America and even after a Black family spent two terms in the White House, the problem we face is the same: The ideological descendants of those segregationists, with their talk of “replacement,” their rants against diversity and their descriptions of everything they don’t like as “wokeness,” are trying to threaten everyone fighting for a multiracial democracy into submission.

Members of the Patriot Front who marched July 4 chanted “Reclaim America,” Reuters reported.

Though there have obviously been moments when those white supremacist voices were quieter, at no point between the 1960s and now have they gone silent. The Ku Klux Klan marched a few blocks from campus when I was a student at Washington University in St. Louis in the 1990s. A beloved Black professor chided the Association of Black Students for not making a show of opposition to the racists on parade. But our decision to ignore them arose from the belief that responding to provocation is unproductive and that nothing good would come from gifting them our attention.

Besides, Black people never have to go looking for white supremacy to be confronted by it. They can count on it showing up soon enough.

That is the story of that photo: A young Black woman on the Metro going about her business and then finding herself surrounded. While more details about her background and where she was going would be nice to know, those details aren’t necessary to absorb the symbolism to see that she, in that moment, has a particularly acute case of a chronic problem that infects us all.

Some may see that photo and think of the passage in a New Testament letter in which Paul describes himself and others as “troubled on every side, yet not distressed … perplexed, but not in despair; Persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed.” At least, that’s what I think when I see it. I see a young woman who’s surrounded by trouble — but hasn’t succumbed to it.

That appearance of equanimity in the middle of encompassing hatred characterizes the depictions of a young Ruby Bridges, too, and so many civil rights-era photos of people in frightening predicaments. But its similarities with photos of that bygone era is what makes the photo so jarring.

In fact, it should make us ask how much of that era is bygone.

The post What the July 4 photo of a Black woman surrounded by white supremacists says about America appeared first on MS NOW.

Estados Unidos es el único anfitrión que queda vivo en la competición, Pulisic y compañía quieren llevar al Team USA a lo más alto, pero Bélgica quiere dar el golpe en la mesa con Kevin De Bruyne y Romelu Lukaku.

Seven days ago, there was doom and gloom around British players’ performances at this year’s Wimbledon. Then Arthur Fery stepped forward.