Speaker Johnson boasts about Congress’ productivity, despite its lack of productivity

As 2025 neared its end, House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to put a positive spin on the first year of the current Congress by making a specific claim.

“We’ve had one of the most productive Congresses in the history of the institution,” the Louisiana Republican told Fox News in early December. Later that month, he repeated the claim in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, adding that it had been “one of the most productive first years of any Congress in our lifetimes.”

Even by contemporary Republican standards, it was a bizarre and demonstrably false claim. Over the course of 2025, Congress set a modern record for the fewest number of bills signed into law, while also setting a 21st-century record for fewest votes cast.

The House speaker was welcome to try to take pride in the House’s efforts, but to repeatedly emphasize its “productivity” was so ridiculous that it was unclear whether he fully understood the meaning of the word.

Eight months later, he’s doing it again.

During a campaign visit to Michigan this week, a reporter asked Johnson how he and his party intended to overcome Donald Trump’s unpopularity, the war with Iran’s unpopularity and the unpopularity of things like high gas prices.

“We talk about record over rhetoric,” the House speaker replied, adding, “History will record this will be one of the most successful and productive Congresses in the history of the institution, since 1789.”

I don’t understand what it is that Johnson doesn’t understand.

This is not a subjective matter. There’s ample room for debate about the merits of the GOP agenda and the party’s proposals, but questions surrounding congressional productivity are entirely quantitative. We can just count the votes and bills, do the arithmetic and compare the current Congress against its predecessors. It’s really not that complicated.

And when we do the tallies, the results are unambiguous. As NOTUS reported this week, “The 119th Congress is on track to be one of the least productive in recent history, furthering the trend of fewer and fewer bills ever becoming law.”

To be sure, this isn’t the only problem with the current Republican-led Congress — I’m even more concerned about it abandoning its oversight responsibilities and becoming so brazenly subservient to a power-hungry White House — but it’s certainly one of the glaring problems with the ignominious status quo.

Former Republican Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan, who served more than three decades on Capitol Hill, told The Washington Post earlier this year, “I learned ninth-grade civics: You’ve got three equal branches of government. But right now, the Congress is not one of them.”

That was in March. Things have not improved.

By any objective measure, this is a dysfunctional and wildly unpopular institution, filled with scandal-plagued members, that has voluntarily surrendered many of its duties and prerogatives to a president undeserving of such power, and also has struggled to pass the bills championed by GOP leaders.

If Johnson wants to argue that he and his party have passed worthwhile bills, fine. If he wants to make excuses for Republicans’ failures, I’m all ears. If he wants to argue that he and his colleagues will do a better job in the future, he’s welcome to give it a try.

But for the House speaker to keep pretending that Congress has been “productive” on a historic scale is to turn reality on its head.

This post updates our related earlier coverage.

The post Speaker Johnson boasts about Congress’ productivity, despite its lack of productivity appeared first on MS NOW.