If the Justice Department had hoped to bully Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut into abandoning his interest in the White House ballroom project, it doesn’t appear to be working. The Washington Sun reported:

Blumenthal is defending his plans to pursue oversight investigations into the Trump administration after he got a threatening letter from a U.S. attorney with what he called “baseless” threats.

“The public deserves to know the terms under which dozens of American companies were persuaded to donate millions of dollars to the president’s vanity projects,” Blumenthal wrote in a letter Thursday to Aaron Reitz, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas.

One of the odd things about this brouhaha is how seemingly unnecessary it is. Blumenthal is the top Democrat on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations — a panel the Connecticut Democrat will likely soon lead — and as an NBC News report noted, this panel “is tasked with studying the economics and efficiency of government operations.”

So it’s not surprising that Blumenthal has taken an interest in the president’s controversial vanity project. It would have been far more surprising if he hadn’t.

Nevertheless, Aaron Reitz, the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Texas — a Republican lawyer with a colorful professional background — demanded this week that Blumenthal preserve all documents related to his efforts, suggesting the prosecutor was prepared to investigate the investigation.

Reitz went on to warn of “significant legal consequences” if the senator didn’t comply.

Blumenthal, unmoved, made it clear that his investigation would proceed apace, but just as notably, the Democratic senator wrote back to the Texas prosecutor, characterized his intimidation tactics as “unlawful,” explained the basis of the congressional inquiry and concluded his correspondence with this interesting paragraph:

Since you appear to have evidence of the Trump Administration’s efforts to protect corporate donors and Administration officials from legitimate oversight, I accordingly direct you to preserve all records and correspondence, including all communications with the White House or senior officials at the Department of Justice, related to the decision to draft and post your letter. Please confirm by no later than 6:00 p.m. on November 12, 2026, that you have received my letter and have taken steps to preserve the materials described above.

In other words, Blumenthal effectively told Reitz, “You want me to preserve my records? How about you preserve your records.”

On Thursday afternoon, the Republican prosecutor published a follow-up item online — why he has chosen to conduct official business via social media is not at all clear — in which he acknowledged receipt of the senator’s letter.

Reitz added, “Valid investigations must be conducted for a legitimate legislative purpose. I believe that your threatenings may constitute the initiation of unconstitutional investigations conducted for reasons other than a legitimate legislative purpose.” (I suspect the word he was looking for was “threats,” not “threatenings,” though neither applies to reality in this case.)

This might seem like a lot of posturing, but there’s a broader significance to this: Donald Trump’s Justice Department isn’t just panicking about the congressional oversight, which has barely started, and it isn’t simply trying to bully the incoming Democratic majority into submission.

It’s also trying to establish parameters on the kind of oversight it’s prepared to tolerate: If the hyperpoliticized DOJ concludes that Democratic inquiries lack legitimacy, it’s apparently prepared to resist those efforts. Watch this space.

This post updates our related earlier coverage.

The post Key Democrat isn’t backing down on ballroom probe, setting up clash with Trump’s DOJ appeared first on MS NOW.

Author: Source Author

From MS Now.