The Supreme Court sided with Texas on Monday in emergency litigation over a law that its opponents said marked the first time a state has ever required its citizens “to prove their age before reading a newspaper, entering a bookstore, or even accessing the internet.”

Student and trade groups brought emergency applications to the high court against the law, called the App Store Accountability Act. The law is intended to help parents direct and supervise children’s downloads of apps and in-app purchases by requiring age verification, parental consent and age rating and content display.

A federal judge halted the law, finding that it was likely unconstitutional due to its restrictions on speech. Then a federal appellate panel granted the state’s request to lift the judge’s order, leading the groups to seek urgent relief from the high court.

Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, a nonprofit that says its mission is to mobilize young people around educational advocacy and increase youth visibility in policymaking, said the justices should vacate the appellate order “and restore the status quo protecting Texas minors’ access to constitutionally protected content and their parents’ authority to make different content decisions for their families.”

SEAT said the case raises First Amendment issues beyond Texas because most states now have laws requiring age verification or age restrictions for accessing protected speech.

The group cited a high court case from last year in another Texas appeal, where the court said states can require age verification to prevent children from accessing sexually explicit content. SEAT said this case is different from last year’s ruling in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton because the speech at issue in that case was limited to obscene content for minors that isn’t protected by the First Amendment, whereas this case involves non-obscene speech.

Computer & Communications Industry Association’s high court application also cited the Free Speech Coalition case, writing that last year’s ruling was careful to distinguish the circumstances raised by this case, which the trade group said “directly burdens the right of minors and adults to access protected speech.”

The group said the Texas law was especially extreme because no state had ever before required its citizens “to prove their age before reading a newspaper, entering a bookstore, or even accessing the internet.” The act at issue in this case, it said, “does exactly that — for every mobile app on every mobile phone.”

Opposing the applications, Texas said the groups “are wrong to suggest that because some software applications disseminate content protected by the First Amendment, the State cannot regulate the commercial activity between minors, app stores, and developers.” The state said that children “have no right to mobile devices at all” and therefore they have “no right to access software applications on mobile devices.”

No justices noted any dissent from the denials. In line with the court’s typical practice for emergency applications, the court did not explain the denials.

Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration’s legal cases.

The post Supreme Court sides with Texas on age verification and parental consent for apps appeared first on MS NOW.

Author: Source Author

From MS Now.